Information for:


Seattle University School of Law

Andrew Repanich (2L)

Andrew RepanichSociety of Counsel Representing Accused Persons - Seattle Felony Unit

Seattle, WA

Andrew, as an intern for SCRAP, has primarily done research for motions, witnessed hearings and trials, and has been able to argue on behalf of clients for their probation violations. He has also worked closely with a death penalty case, involving researching broad and focused legal issues for litigating and mitigating factors. For the past ten years, Andrew has dedicated himself to public defense and working with organizations handling or looking to abolish the death penalty.

July 29, 2011

During the month I have continued my work on the death penalty case, which unfortunately did not yield as much positive information for the client as I had hoped for. In addition, I have had the good fortune of working directly with clients facing an assortment of felony charges, from possession of drugs to assaults. Also, I was given the opportunity to research caselaw, which allowed an attorney to challenge a judge's decision about a client's right during the trial.

During the course of this month I was also given the opportunity to research and write a suppression motion. Luckily, I received a lot of positive feedback from my supervisor and other attorneys in the office. The attorney who is working with me on the case believes the judge will grant us the suppression, which will result in dismissal. Should we not win the suppression hearing, then on Monday August 1, 2011, I will begin my first felony trial.

One bright and glaring reality I have learned over the course of the summer is that the wheels of justice are not always swift.


June 27, 2011

For the past 6 weeks I have spent the majority of my time doing research related to issues on a death penalty case. In addition, I have been writing and researching a motion to suppress for a felony drug case. The motion is layered with many constitutional issues that have been really amazing to analyze and dissect. Once the motion is completed, I will also be arguing for the defense in open court. The dates for the hearings have yet to be set.

Coinciding with my research, I have shadowed attorneys in trial and doing hearings. Lastly, I have been able to stand up in open court, go on the record, and present arguments before Judge Kessler and Doyle concerning allegations against defendants who have failed to adhere to their probation requirements.

So far the summer has been interesting. The best part has been interacting with clients and arguing in front of Judge Kessler and Judge Doyle. Hopefully, the breadth of exposure will become broader and deeper as the summer continues.

Seattle University