State Judicial Independence - A National Concern
September 14, 2009
Pigott Hall Atrium & Auditorium
Approved for 7.75 general CLE credits by the Washington State Bar Association and 7.50 Judicial MCE credits
Featured speaker: Justice Sandra Day O'Connor
| Agenda | Sponsors | |
|---|---|
|
7:30 a.m. |
Breakfast |
|
8 a.m. |
Session 1: One Symptom of a Serious Problem - Caperton v. Massey Moderator: David Skover, Fredric C. Tausend Professor of Law, Seattle University School of Law Panel Participants:
Focus: With Caperton v. Massey, the U.S. Supreme Court explores the conflict between constitutional fairness (due process guarantees) and the reality and appearance of state judicial integrity and evenhandedness. With its striking facts - a corporation's exorbitant financial efforts to secure the election of a state high court judge who would inevitably sit on the appeal of its pending litigation - the Caperton case puts into bold relief a dilemma of national proportions. On the one hand, as long as states continue to elect their judges, campaign contributions remain a necessity; on the other hand, dramatic escalation in judicial campaign spending undermines the safeguards of judicial impartiality necessary to maintain the rule of law. Caperton thus affords an opportunity to consider an important aspect of the question of state court independence - namely, that relating to money and judicial elections. Whatever the limitations of its holding, Caperton supports the view that state judicial impartiality is not the sole province of the state government. Put starkly, "justice for sale" in a state court system is not only a federalism concern, but a federal concern. |
|
10:15 a.m. |
Break |
|
10:30 a.m. |
Session 2: The Problem of State Judicial Campaign "Arms Races" - What Can Be Done in the State Legislatures and State Courts? Moderator: Ronald Collins, First Amendment Center Scholar Panel Participants:
Focus: When campaign expenditures - because of their size, timing, and manner of making - threaten the state judiciary's duty to render due process, one of America's most fundamental values is transgressed. |
|
12:15 - 1 p.m. |
Lunch |
|
1 p.m. |
Speakers |
|
2 p.m. |
Session 3: "Fred Friendly" Panel Discussion on Judicial Selection via a Commission System Moderator: John McKay, Seattle University School of Law Panel Participants:
Focus: Panel discussion will focus on questions such as the following:
|
|
3:45 p.m. |
Break |
|
4 p.m. |
Session 4: Town Hall Meeting: Discussion with Audience Moderator: Ruth Walsh McIntyre, Chair of Walsh Commission
Focus: Using a "Town Hall" format, the panel will engage the audience in an open discussion of the tensions between the accountability and independence values that are raised by electing judges. Questions will be fielded from particular interest groups: legislators, AGs, civic organizations, journalists, law students. |
|
5:30 p.m. |
Reception hosted by Washington Chapter of the AJS in Sullivan Hall |
